Based on 2,091 user benchmarks for the Nvidia GeForce 310 and the Quadro FX 380, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 608 GPUs. UserBenchmark USA-User. Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2019 GPU Rankings. Geforce vs Quadro – What’s the Difference? April 12, 2017 Josh Covington 35 Comments Another of the frequently asked questions we get when custom configuring a PC or workstation for a customer is which NVIDIA GPU option is best – Geforce vs Quadro.

Quadro FX cards are equipped with heavy rendering capabilities than GTX280. So they are much capable for high end Video editing applications. Some of the features that Quadro FX card have are: - 128-bit color precision - Unlimited fragment instruction - Unlimited vertex instruction - 3D volumetric texture support - 12 pixels per clock rendering engine - Hardware accelerated antialiased points and lines - Hardware OpenGL overlay planes - Hardware accelerated two-sided lighting - Hardware accelerated clipping planes - 3rd generation occlusion culling - 16 textures per pixel in fragment programs - Window ID clipping functionality - Hardware accelerated line stippling. All Gaming GPU's are developed from Quadro's. The Chip of Quadro FX 5800 is used in GeForce GTX 280 (240 shaders). The Chip of Quadro FX 4800 is used in GeForce GTX 260 (192 shaders). According to nvidia Officials: All Gaming cards are designed for their speed of rendering.

While Professional cards for the capability of high resource handling. They produce precise images than gaming/consumer level GPU's. So for a gamer, no need of Professional cards. I think, games can't be played well in Quadros.

(as Sri Aksan Sjuman) Cinematography by Film Editing by Art Direction by Costume Design by Makeup Department. (as Titi Handayani Sjuman). Makeup artist Production Management. Film sang penari full movie videos free download.

Difference is like Xenon Workstation and Core2Extreme. I can't really say how the card will perform, as I don't own one and cannot find gaming benchmarks. I did discover that the Quadro FX 1700 is based of the G84 process. Notably, this process also spawned the 8600 GTS, 8600 GT and 8400 GS. Given this information, coupled with your question regarding gaming performance, I am speculating that the FX 1700 performs at a level similar to that of its relatives. Lastly, while I could not find gaming benchmarks for the FX 1700, I did find these for other Quadro and FireGL models.

(note - link contains $1000+ cards).

Hi all, Yes, I know this is a tough question but I'm building a new system from scratch and am still flipping between video cards. I don't want to spend $1000 on a video card but in reading through all the posts and the knowledge base, the Nvidia Quadro FX is recommended. Saying that, the GeForce appears better (faster) but I don't really know how the Quadro series differs from the GeForce or how it interfaces with VW (Spotlight). Nvidia Quadro FX 580: 512mb GDDR3 128-bit 25.6 GB/sec PCI-E 2.0 32 x CUDA cores Open GL 3.0 DirectX 10 VERSUS Nvidia GeForce GTX 560: 1gb GDDR5 256-bit 128 GB/sec PCI-E 2.0 336 x CUDA cores Open GL 4.2 DirectX 11 Thanks, Dave.

For the GeForce series get the GTX570. Best bang for the buck. Do not know how well if at all VW utilizes Quadro cards. I should think there would be something at VW website about this. All you VW Gurus, please chime in. 2x2 rubik's cube solver. Most CAD software uses the CPU for the better /best renderings not the GPU (graphics card). This has been an on going issue with most CAD software.

I do hear that ACAD (harumph) does utilize the GPU. This is as it should be. What is the point of spending big money on a great graphics card if the software (CAD) will not utilize it? Imho taoist Edited July 10, 2011 by taoist. Hi Dave As you've noticed, for the similar money, the Geforce is a lot more powerful than a Quadro based on the Cuda Cores (which is the most important). Also if you read on the net some people actually have hacks that will make their Geforce (certain cards) into a Quadro.